It appears that President Obama seems determined to go to Denmark next month and sign a global treaty on CO2 emissions, with an intended pledge of 17% reduction in CO2 gasses. Once the treaty is signed it would allow an international body to regulate global CO2 emissions, superceding the sovreignty of the United States in some aspects. Recently some sensitive emails were hacked which display a pattern of deception, falsified or corrupted data, and omissions of data that would counter the anthropogenic theory of global warming.
If the treaty is signed, is there any way the Congress or another future administration could pull us out? I'm just exasperated at the lunacy of the global warming crowd who have use fear mongering and distortion to move this cause forward (not dissimilar to what they accused GWB & Dick Cheney of doing to get us into Iraq). Any who oppose them on scientific grounds are accused of working for industry or "big oil" or are lampooned as idiots. Yet the cerebral genius Gore is protected from any who are skeptical and wish to have an objective debate on the merits of his claims.
I have read that Lord Christopher Monckton, a former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has said a goal ofthe United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government.
"At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed,"...."I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created. The world 'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. "The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third World countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't. We've been screwing up the climate and they haven't. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government is enforcement."
This is nothing new. In years and decades past there has been lots of talk and articles about a planned single global government. Recently, even the first president of the European Union, Belgian Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy, stated that "global governance" is only way to address the crises that beset the planet.
"We're living through exceptionally difficult times the financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival, a period ofanxiety, uncertainty, and lack of confidence," he said in his maiden press conference. "Yet these problems can be overcome through a joint effort between our countries. Two-thousand and nine is also the first year of global governance with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step toward the global manaagement of our planet."
But Glenn Beck in his book Glenn Beck's Common Sense tells us that "....there is no global conspiracy playing out. The individuals and groups that propagate those lies have their own agendas, but, like all radicals and revolutionaries, they will eventually seek to impose their rules and lifestyle on all of us." So who are we supposed to believe?
What is considered a small conspiracy to one person is a big one to someone else. You can always find a conspiracy theory that encompasses even more then the previous one.
Glenn Beck is at least focusing on the obvious ones, unlike most of the media.
This is just speculation, but d'ya think Glenn Beck may be holding back on some of what he has discovered to keep from getting stomped on? Both President Benson when he was the Prophet and more recently President Packer have made statements that I took as warnings about "secret combination(s)", but as far as I know, no Prophet or Apostle has ever identified conspiracy participants by name, nor even by position. It seems to me that Beck may be giving us just enough to try to stimulate our interest and concern but not enough to jerk the tail of the beast.