Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Constitutional Respect


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 241
Date:
Constitutional Respect


This bill has had its first reading in the Washington Legislature. Oklahoma and New Hampshire have passed similar bills.

H-1028.1 _____________________________________________
HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 4009
_____________________________________________
State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session
By Representatives Shea, Klippert, Condotta, Kretz, Anderson, McCune,
and Kristiansen
Read first time 01/30/09. Referred to Committee on State Government &
Tribal Affairs.
1 TO THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND
2 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF
3 REPRESENTATIVES, AND TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
4 UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE
5 SENATE AND SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH STATE'S
6 LEGISLATURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
7 We, your Memorialists, the Senate and House of Representatives of
8 the State of Washington, in legislative session assembled, respectfully
9 represent and petition as follows:
10 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
11 States specifically provides that, "The powers not delegated to the
12 United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
13 are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
14 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
15 power as being those powers specifically granted to it by the
16 Constitution of the United States and no more; and
17 WHEREAS, Federalism is the constitutional division of powers
18 between the national and state governments and is widely regarded as
19 one of America's most valuable contributions to political science; and
p. 1 HJM 4009
1 WHEREAS, James Madison, "the father of the Constitution," said,
2 "The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined.
3 Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and
4 indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external
5 objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The
6 powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects
7 which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties,
8 and properties of the people."; and
9 WHEREAS, Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not
10 "subordinate" to the national government, but rather the two are
11 "coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. The one is
12 the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government.";
13 and
14 WHEREAS, Alexander Hamilton expressed his hope that "the people
15 will always take care to preserve the constitutional equilibrium
16 between the general and the state governments." He believed that "this
17 balance between the national and state governments forms a double
18 security to the people. If one [government] encroaches on their
19 rights, they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed,
20 they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional
21 limits by [the] certain rivalship which will ever subsist between
22 them."; and
23 WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
24 that the federal government was created by the states specifically to
25 be limited in its powers relative to those of the various states; and
26 WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as
27 agents of the federal government; and
28 WHEREAS, Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
29 Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
30 WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v.
31 United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply
32 commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
33 WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and
34 some now being considered by the present administration and from
35 Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States;
36 NOW, THEREFORE, Your Memorialists respectfully resolve:
37 (1) That the State of Washington hereby claims sovereignty under
HJM 4009 p. 2
1 the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
2 powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government
3 by the Constitution of the United States; and
4 (2) That this serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal
5 government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of
6 the United States established it and to cease and desist, effective
7 immediately, any and all mandates that are beyond the scope of its
8 constitutionally delegated powers.

9 BE IT RESOLVED, That copies of this Memorial be immediately
10 transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United
11 States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the
12 House of Representatives, the President of the Senate and the Speaker
13 of the House of Representatives of each state's legislature of the
14 United States of America, and each member of Congress from the State of
15 Washington.

__________________


Profuse Pontificator

Status: Offline
Posts: 876
Date:

The 10th Amendment states that "The powers not delegated to the Unites States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Those powers are spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.
 

Are the following actions by our FedGov constitutional?

Federal funding of abortion?

Federal funding of local schools?

Federal regulation of production of energy resources within a state?

Federal administration of welfare programs?

Federal expenditure for foreign aid?


Are the following FedGov agencies constitutional?

Environmental Protection Agency?

Occupational Safety and Health Agency?

Federal Communications Commission

Pure Food and Drug Administration

Consumer Protection Agency?



__________________


Profuse Pontificator

Status: Offline
Posts: 876
Date:

We have one in Arizona as well, in both our House and Senate.

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

claiming sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the constitution of the united states over certain powers, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.



HCR2024 in the House and SCR1038 in the Senate is our first step in
getting the Federal government back under control. These bills let
congress know that we will no longer put up with their violation of
the 9th and 10th amendments to the Constitution which let them know
that they can't do anything not delegated to them in the US
Constitution. If they continue to ignore this contract (the US
Constitution), we will have to, as a state, take action to enforce the
contract.

Since the states have gone so long ignoring the contract, we thought
this warning that we would not do so any more, would be a courteous
first step in restoring our Republic. We will be the 4th state to take
such a step.



-- Edited by lundbaek at 15:03, 2009-02-04

__________________


Head Chef

Status: Offline
Posts: 4439
Date:

I think that most people don't understand the idea of limited government. They want government to take care of their every need, ignoring that a government that can supply all you want can also take it all away.
Our current federal government only bears a passing resemblance to what the founders envisioned.
I want a Constitutional government. I'm going to vote Constitution Party again next time.

__________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!
- Samuel Adams


Profuse Pontificator

Status: Offline
Posts: 876
Date:

I think there is more to this issue than just what I and others want or dont want in the way of government in compliance with the US Constitution. The Lord told us that He inspired the writing of the Constitution (D&C 101:77&80). He told us to "befriend" the constitutional law of the land. (D&C 98:6). And He told us He holds us accountable for our actions in relation to government (D&C 134:1). So like it or not, I believe we are under a serious obligation Re. our Constitution.

Fortunately, as it so happens, I have come to understand and appreciate the benefits of compliance with the Constitution. But there are other Church positions that I am not so accepting of. One in particular is the Churchs apparent support of illegal immigrants once in country. Another is the silent shift from discouraging (to put it mildly) members from seeking and accepting welfare assistance from government to asking for and accepting government welfare. These are things that I feel I have to accept and live with even though my opinion is at variance with the Churchs position.

My point is that though some LDSs may not like strict compliance with the Constitution, especially in the tradition of the Founding Fathers, or the way the Lord gave it to us, we are obliged to live with it just as I have to live with the Churchs apparent position on illegal immigrants.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard