I have a friend who is LDS, and isn't voting for Romney because he feels that members of the church should be held to a higher standard. He feels that Romney is a panderer and showed me a You-tube video where he said something that could be seen as contradicting basic church doctrine, I have been looking into it lately, but it doesn't look good.
Although I should also mention that this is the same friend who is a semi-socialist, and refuses to vote for anyone who supports guantanamo bay.
Anyway, I have become discusted with the race recently. I refuse to vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, and if it comes to McCain or Huckabee I would have to think about it some more (If I vote for them, it would solely be a vote aganst the Democrats). Romney although still my favorite hasn't taken the high road like I had hoped. As to Ron Paul, I love a bunch of his ideas for domestic policy, but I feel his foreign policy is as bad or worse then the Democrats.
Tomorrow is Super Duper Tuesday, and that should clear things up.
I think that this was the same debate that I say a portion of. I was glad that the Republicans were not being contentious as Clinton and Obama were in their debate prior to the Republican debate(think South Carolina). I felt like Russert was trying to bait them by asking them what they thought about the other canidates records on this or that rather than just asking a canidate about their own record. The Republicans seemed to avoid such contention in what I saw.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen! - Samuel Adams