Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Democrat Senator has brain surgery


Head Chef

Status: Offline
Posts: 4439
Date:
Democrat Senator has brain surgery


This article says that the balance of power in the senate may change if the senator from South Dakota dies. The Republican governor would then appoint a replacement.
The democrats are saying that brain surgery is no big deal, and that the senator is fine.

__________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!
- Samuel Adams


Hot Air Balloon

Status: Offline
Posts: 5370
Date:

Is it wrong to be giddy?


--Ray



__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special.
(Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)


Wise and Revered Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 2882
Date:

Giddy about a man possibly dieing is wrong.  Giddy about your party getting power back is good.  You can separate the two.

__________________

God Made Man, Sam Colt Made Him Equal.

Jason



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 418
Date:

If, sadly, Sen. Johnson doesn't recover there is question about what the Republican governor should do.  Some are saying he should appoint another Democrat because that is what the people who voted for him would want.  However, did they vote for Sen. Johnson because he is a Democrat or for Sen. Johnson because of who he is and it just so happens he is a Democrat?   I personally don't think he was voted into office because he is a Democrat.


Hopefully Sen. Johnson will recover.  If he doesn't, I feel sorry for the governor with the decision before him.



__________________


Understander of unimportant things

Status: Offline
Posts: 4126
Date:

Ditto, TT.


If per chance he doesn't recover or opts to retire / give up his seat, whether or not the governor appoints a Republican or a conservative Democrat is not going to make a whole lot of difference in the long run.  The Senate will either remain the same or be split 50 / 50  along partisan lines, and either way not much is going to get done because of the partisan bickering.  I mean, think about it, do we really think much is going to get done as it stands now with the Democrats holding a simple majority of one seat?  We would be foolish to imagine things are going to be any different than it has been for the last 12 years.  Just different actors in the various roles.



__________________
It seems to me the only thing you've learned is that Caesar is a "salad dressing dude."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 254
Date:

The party in power makes at least one crucial difference.  That is, with Republicans in the majority, it is possible to send the president's judicial and other nominees to the Senate for them to either vote on or filibuster, or exercise the so-called "nuclear option" or let the threat of that force some concessions by the Democrats.


With the Democrats in power, if they oppose one of the president's nominees his name will never be released by the relevant committee to be voted on by the entire Senate.  And if it did happen by some miracle, Senator Reid, the new majority leader, will never exercise the "nuclear option" because he agrees with the principle of thwarting justices who follow rather than create law, and was Daschle's right-hand man in doing so.


Any chance of getting an originalist justice added to the Supreme Court in the next two years is therefore extremely small.



-- Edited by Randy at 08:50, 2006-12-15

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard