A subject that comes up each election is the Electoral College. Some people are for abolishing it, prefering a direct vote for president. I happen to support the idea; one thing it accomplishes, for instance, is preventing the major population centers on the East and West coasts from determining the political direction for the rest of the country.
__________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen! - Samuel Adams
I'm for it as well. (And I can't believe you used a wiki link. )
__________________
"The promptings of the Holy Ghost will always be sufficient for our needs if we keep to the covenant path. Our path is uphill most days, but the help we receive for the climb is literally divine." --Elaine S. Dalton
What people seem to forget is that the United States of America wasn't meant to be a unitary form of government, but a union of autonomous self governing states. It is the states that elect the President of the United States, not the people.
If the Electoral College is revoked, then the only thing left that would recognize the rights of States would be the fact each state has 2 senators regardless of population (Of course senators are no longer selected by the States government, but by popular vote.)
I guess it's the "winner takes all" that may be the problem? Someone can get 1% more votes than the next guy but ALL the electoral votes go to number 1 in some of the states... that doesn't seem right.
-- Edited by Cocobeem at 09:27, 2008-05-14
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
What people seem to forget is that the United States of America wasn't meant to be a unitary form of government, but a union of autonomous self governing states. It is the states that elect the President of the United States, not the people.
If the Electoral College is revoked, then the only thing left that would recognize the rights of States would be the fact each state has 2 senators regardless of population (Of course senators are now longer selected by the States government, but by popular vote.)
PT, what you should have said was that "what people seem to not know...." People didn't pay attention in class during high school when talking about the electoral college. If you were to ask an American on any city street why we have the electoral college, I'm guessing the answer would be, "So the politicians can have a place to go to school."
__________________
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
Wouldn't taking away the electoral college weaken the smaller states? Candidates would spend all their time in the major populations centers on the east and west coasts and ignore the middle states. Small states have much more power under the electoral college than they otherwise would, especially in close races where these blocks of votes matter.