I just saw the Golden Compass. I haven't read the book, but from where I'm standing, the "protect your poor innocent children from this evil movie" hype over the movie is sorely misguided and unnecessary.
Random thoughts: * This is a good vs. evil movie, just like any other good vs. evil movie. And the evil people are not Catholic in this movie. Maybe they severely watered down the book, but there is no anti-religious message I could detect.
* The Magesterium bad guys seem a bit one dimensional to me. They're bad because they want to control everyone and have all the power, and that's pretty much it. They try to keep aspects of reality quiet, because it would spread dissent, and people would be harder to control, and they dress up their efforts as attempts to help people be happy. The evil chick that beats up her own daemon, cuz when you're evil, you got issues, and that's about as deep as it goes. Maybe I missed something, but I didn't figure out why they were performing the Nazi-like experiments of cutting children away from their daemons.
* When a person is killed, their daemon dissapears in a gentile shower of sparks. But if this is athiest propaganda, they need to get themselves a better PR person, because there isn't any accompanying message about a lack of an afterlife. The movie allows a rational conclusion to be drawn that souls move on, just like we religious folk believe they do here. Just like Harry Potter, there just isn't much spirituality or anti-spirituality to be found. The closest thing we seem to have to a genuine faith belongs to the witches - and the only thing we really know about their faith, is that their prophecy about the little girl seems to be coming true.
* There is pretty clear message on the topic of out of wedlock births. Any resultant pain or discomfort in the parent's or children's lives as a result of not having married parents, is the fault of the culture that frowns on such an arrangement.
* The movie definitely considers itself the first installment. The cool battle at the end is a clear portent for bigger things to come.
I wont' be taking my 6 yr old to see this movie, for the same reason I won't take her to see Harry Potter or LOTR. A bit too violent, with confusing plot twists that would go over her head.
LM
__________________
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, seven hours every day. That would be the sweetest thing of all.
LoudmouthMormon wrote: * The movie definitely considers itself the first installment. The cool battle at the end is a clear portent for bigger things to come.
Haven't read the books, haven't seen the movie, but this (the bold) is what I have been told is where the trap really lies. As the story progresses it becomes more and more blatantly anti-religion. The first book/movie is supposedly designed to make you a fan before the whammy of the rest of the saga.
I won't be taking my kids to it, because I have not personally looked at it enough to see if I feel there is a problem. I've read many good vs. evil books and have no problem with them.
I frankly don't want a penny of my money going to the creep that wrote the original books which is why I won't be going. The movie may be benign but I don't want that guy thinking my money is somehow supporting his beliefs and anti religion public statements.
__________________
Jason (Formerly salesortonscom)
As I walk through this earth, nothing can stop, the Duke of Mirth!
The producers of the movie worked hard to remove any 'anti-religious' items from the movie (thus raising the ire of atheistic hard-core book fans), but one of the big things I have seen, and agree with, in protest of the movie is if kids like the movies they will want to read the books. And the books, esp. as you get into them, are blatantly anti-religious. Considering that the books are one of the top sellers on Amazon.com right now, I would say that prediction has proven true.
Somehow my 13 year old ended up seeing it.... we thought he was going to see something else.
He won't see the next movies if I can help it.
__________________
no unhallowed hand can stop the work from progressing... the truth of God will go forth till it has penetrated every website, sounded in every ear, till the purposes of God shall be accomplished and the great Jehovah shall say the work is done
I dunno. I can't seem to get with the "the battle for your children's souls will occur in the pages of fiction books they read" bandwagon. I mean, people are acting like an epidemic of athiesm will break out based on the popularity of fantasy books written by an athiest to forward his agenda. If such things occur, shouldn't an epidemic of 'there is no God - just good guys and bad guys' have already occured with the Harry Potter books?
What's wrong with exposing children to different belief systems at certain ages?
As a youth, I read all sorts of fantasy and sci-fi books. In elementary school I read the Hardy Boys books, and their parents drank wine and smoked! I read the Battlefield Earth decology from the founder of Dianetics/Scientology. I read Piers Anthony's Xanth series, with it's absolute dearth of supreme being, his Space Tyrant series, where the good guy legalizes all drug use and eliminates age of consent laws, and his Incarnations series, where humans take on the roles of god, satan, death, time, etc.. I read Frank Herbert's Dune books, with it's very convincing portrayal of religion as something that dictates behavior of the masses, with people occasionally able to sieze the reigns. I read Stephen R. Donaldson's Covenant series, where god and satan have to play by the rules, and the hero rapes a 14 yr old girl in the first 25 pages. And yet here I am, staring at my temple recommend right now. These books served as a backdrop against which I tested my evolving belief system. They didn't serve as a belief system to be poured into an empty head, devoid of the Light of Christ.
My kids just finished reading Huck Finn. You want a counterculture danger to your kid's belief systems - show them Mark Twain. Throughout the book, Huck struggled with his loss of respect for his friend Tom Sawyer, who was helping to free Jim the slave. Huck's faith in his friend was restored, when it was revealed that Tom knew all along that Jim was free, and was just looking for excitement and adventure. And yet, my kids seem to have the same distaste for the concept of slavery they had at the start.
Well, anyway, if Pullman is actually seeping his way into the souls of our youth, someone should tell Deseret Book about it, so they can stop selling his books.
LM [In the odd position of being the homeschooling dad, lecturing people on sheltering their kids too much.]
__________________
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, seven hours every day. That would be the sweetest thing of all.
That is your view and your choice and you are entitle to it. Every kid and family is different so I defer to them for their own families. I don't think kids will run out and become athiests but I do think that it may have the questioning things that they might not have. While the Chronicles of Narnia, the LOTR, or even Charles Dickens Christmas Carol did not make become a non Mormon, they did influence how I think about my faith and in a good way. We look for parallels to our own lives in many films. I can not tell you how many comparrisons I have heard from others about the gospel in different sci fi movies or books. We tend to take what we know and what we learn and make comparrisons and log similarities in our brains. I saw the Mississippi River for the first time a couple years ago and immediately thought back to reading Huck Finn in my teen years which invariable reminded me of the controversial nature of some of the language in the book which reminded me of Jim Crow, Slavery etc. Whenever I see a pregnant woman I think of those Alien's movies. I don't try to do this it just is how my brain works. When I see an aircraft carrier I think of Top Gun which reminds me the famous suck your face off Top Gun kiss on the motorcycle which reminds me of EFY and some lady who spoke who told us it wasn't proper to kiss like that which advice I snickered at and proceeded to ignore as a teen because it looked like it was fun to suck face with a hot girl, which makes me feel stupid for not listening to the counsel of those who knew better now that I'm an adult. Now I know it is illogical and thankfully I have higher order reasoning skills now but many young people do not and will be influenced by it. So that's why there are parents who can step in and who know their children and can make those decisions based on what they know is good for their children. I know my children and they would probably want to read the book after seeing the movie and I knowing them I don't really think they need that sort of thing at this stage in their lives. If they want to read them as an adult that is their choice.
__________________
Jason (Formerly salesortonscom)
As I walk through this earth, nothing can stop, the Duke of Mirth!
I'm not going to see the movie because I'm tired of CG animation and special effects. I want a movie where nothing blows up, and animals don't talk or act like humans.
As a child and a teen, I read lots of fantasy books, and several books with anti-religious messages. They were pretty easy to spot, and I quit reading the ones that were so far off my actual experiences with religion that they were obnoxious. I did that without ever even discussing the issue with my parents - they didn't read my books. I think a kid who has had good experiences with religion (nice Primary teacher, bishop who shakes his hand, parents who teach him to pray) is not going to have his worldview changed by a book or movie. But kids who don't know much about religion may have a problem.
LM - did you read Anne McCaffrey's dragonrider books? Those have an anti-family theme all the way through, with all the unwed births, dragon mating, and fostering that goes on. In her more recent dragon books (or at least the Masterharper of Pern book), she's even gave up the word "marriage" in favor of "espouse". Didn't affect my ideas about the importance of family, although I did roll my eyes at some of her more anti-family statements.
It's up to the parents. Whatever they feel comfortable with. I can understand the concern even if it isn't a very big concern for me personally.
The running joke in the LM family is we timed the birth of our children to coincide with the LOTR movie releases. I remember reading Tolkein in Jr. High - hoping against hope that moviemaking might eventually evolve the capacity to do the books justice.
I never read the dragonrider books, but I played an incredibly dumb Commodore64 Dragonrider game once.
I certainly agree that parents need to keep their kid's specific maturity levels and impressionability (is that a word?) in mind when figuring out what they can and can't see. As I mentioned, my 6 and 3 yr olds will be skipping this one, although we might read the books down the road when studying other worldviews.
LM
__________________
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, seven hours every day. That would be the sweetest thing of all.