The following link is potentially offensive to some, but it's about how in France there is now a medical procedure which claims to "restore virginity" due to the Islamic need for a wife to be a virgin, and the horrible punitive nature of islam upon women who for any reason cannot show evidence of it upon the night of one's wedding.
This is really sad. While I bemoan the ravages of feminism, I don't like its opposite either. I forget where I heard it, but the opposite of dysfunctional is dysfunctional. For instance, someone who will sleep with whomever, whenever is dysfunctional. But someone who will not sleep with anyone for any reason, including their spouse, is also dysfunctional.
__________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen! - Samuel Adams
From a woman (and a Rape survivor) I just have to say... that this surgery in the OP is so WRONG! On SO many levels, I can't even wrap my head around the concept! <major exploding head here>
Jason... if you hear of a surgery like the one you mention (for stupidity, that is) would you PRETTY PLEASE send me an email...? I could really put that one to use...
It was about a doctor in LA who does the same procedure (or at least very similar). Honestly the entire concept really bothered me.
I feel the entire concept disregards in a grievous way the trust that should exist between potential spouses. I don't understand how anyone could try to hide something so important. Also, if a woman has this surgery, she still has the "disease risk" of sexually transmitted diseases. What happens if she has this surgery and then later gives the new husband some STD. Sooner or later she'll be found out.
Saying this, and PollyAnna I hope you know I am saying this with a totally sincere heart and as one who has never been and hopefully never will be in your position:
I could understand if someone who was a virgin and a victim of either incest or rape wished to get this surgery. Even though people in such situations are definitely still pure and innocent, I could understand if they desired to have this surgery to feel "physically" the way they were prior to the gross violation. However, they truly are still a virgin and so in that sense wouldn't need this surgery.
Nita, I respect what you are trying to say... but from my viewpoint as one who has spent a long time working at personal healing, there are much healthier ways... that surgery would not truly change a thing, it can't reverse what was done or make someone feel different about their memories. Healing happens through Christ... And it has been my experience that some doctors don't GET anything, especially that concept... That is certainly true in this case...
I think it is admirable that you would like to help someone who has gone through a horrible experience to feel that the abuse did not happen, I just don't think this is the a viable option for that.
PollyAnna- I understand your view and you are right, I meant it as something if someone wanted it and felt they needed it as a component to their healing. But you are absolutely right in that type of healing, the Atonement and the saving balm of the Savior have to be what matters most.
PollyAna, I sent you a PM, if you get a chance to look at it. Thanks.
__________________
Lo, there I see my mother, my sisters, my brothers Lo, there I see the line of my people back to the beginning Lo, they call to me, they bid me take my place among them In the halls of Valhalla, where the brave may live...forever