This article points out the hypocrisy of Hollywood highlighting the Mountain Meadow Massacre and then using it as a "lesson to all" about a real terrorist threat...
Are we lucky?
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
You know, after reading a more on this history this last month, there was so much zeal going on in Utah, especially the southern Utah regions... so much happening with the Johnson's Army on their way, the murder of PPPratt... I don't know. This was definitely a black mark, hard to defend to those not familiar with the context of what happened. The Indian-Mormon relationships... I mean, there's so many layers to this event...
One thing I know is that I'm gonna' see the movie.
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
It's Rated R... so I'm not gonna see it... I've seen the equivalent of this type of movie over and over again portraying Religion X and hollywood's fixation on how it can control another person's life. Hollywood is a religion in and of itself... so it's not surprising that it villifies its rivals...
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
i knew a fellow who interpreted the arm chopping as disarming the enemy, rather than actually chopping off limbs...
that said, I don't begrudge you the right to watch rated R anything... I just know that I lack the spiritual maturity in so many things that I take a little comfort in the few things such as that one rule that I can mostly adhere to... Then again, I could be a little more discriminating about the PG-13 and PG films I watch too...
Clearly though, considering the topic of this movie, it's a pretty big nobrainer for me.
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
You don't have any desire to see it? Have you read any history about the actual event or those involved? Stuff like this fascinates me... maybe I'm stupid. I just like to see how people can get to a place where they think this is okay. Add to that the fact that these were endowed LDSs, it just adds to my fascination.
I too find it interesting to contemplate how those people got to the place where they did what they did.
But no, I don't have any desire to see this particular depiction of it. I have a strong suspicion that this movie will portray the complex and intricate process of God fearing, peace loving people ending up participating in a massacre like this:
Step 1. Drink the Kool-aid. The end.
I think I'll save my $7.50 for something more worthwhile.
Fox news reported on the film this morning and said that the film lacks historical context and also implicates Brigham Young in the event even though there is no historical evidence to support it.
I had seen an interview with John Voight a few weeks back who plays the part of Brigham Young in the film. He indicated most Mormons wouldn't see the film because they didn't want to face this part of their history. I was yelling at the T.V. screen, "No, most Mormons won't see your movie because it is rated R you moron!"
I don't plan on seeing it at all. I don't watch R rated movies.
"I don't have any desire to see this particular depiction of it."
See, how do any of us know what parts are true or not unless we've actually done some of our own study of the matter? That's why I think I'll have an advantage, because at least I know SOMETHING about what really happened...
It's like the kangaroo theory... You know there are certain motions a kangaroo will go through before attacking you? Most kangaroos are docile, but there are a few kangaroo attacks every year that injure people. However, if you know the "signs" you can always avoid this. The signs are- 1. The give you what looks like a big smile. This is in fact showing you their teeth. 2. They compulsively check their pouch, as they never attack with joeys in their pouch. 3. They glance behind them several times to secure their escape route.
Now, since I've told you these signs, you will never forget them... next week or decades from now you will still remember this. You know what the problem is?
THEY'RE ALL COMPLETELY MADE UP!!! Yes, they're total crap.
But if you don't know that or bother to check it out, you're stuck with total crap the rest of your life. Anyway, of course there is no "historical evidence" to support the idea that BY was involved. There's not much "historical evidence" of much at all. Nobody talked. There is testimony that "Do your duty!" was shouted at the beginning of the event and other declarations like, "For the kingdom of God!"
I don't know, I guess it doesn't "bother" me like it does other people, and I'd like to see how we are being portrayed so I can give some sort of answer to people if I'm asked about it. Same reason I saw Passion of the Christ. At least I steered the Sunday School class off some totally "out there" wrong premises, being the only one who'd seen it...
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
"How easy it would be for your leaders to lead you to destruction, unless you actually know the mind and will of the Spirit yourselves. That is your privelege. " --Brigham Young (June 28, 1857, Journal of Discourses, 4:368) 3 months before MMM
-- Edited by Cocobeem at 09:21, 2007-08-15
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
Personally I have no desire to see the movie simply because it boils my blood when I see things from church history or relating to church history that are taken out of context. And sometimes they are completely inaccurate. How often does Hollywood portray anything accurately? Particularly when it comes to the Church. I agree with Jason though when he wanted to yell at Jon Voight through the t.v. as to why most mormons wouldn't want to see it. Hollywood and celebrities have no clue! However, I did think this newspaper article was interesting. The guy who wrote it made some valid points. Hollywood does seem to avoid doing anything that would put a bad light on Muslims and even Hitler, but they have no problem putting mormons in a bad light. Hmmm. Wonder why that is? I think we can all guess.
I guess I just don't concern myself that much about what others say about me.
I guess my point is not to put my head in the sand, but to simply state that I don't believe that no matter how rigorous a study of history, one can fully capture the moment of inspiration or the context of it--unless you're there, and even then, you seldom understand it when it's happening.
I think about the disciples, when they walked with Christ... it's so easy to say they were completely clueless about Christ's death and ressurrection... yet I didn't live it, and can only view it from the commentaries given after his death. John states repeatedly in his Gospel that he simply didn't understand what Christ was talking about until after Christ was glorified, and the Spirit had worked upon them.
Not that you're doing this, but I think anyone who bases their testimony or lack thereof upon historical evidence is leaving themselves open to be deceived by one's own time and culture... which may be as equally (or more) toxic as the culture they deride.
>shrug<
I'm just reaching a point in my own life where I need the Spirit all the time... and telling it to take a break for a few hours so I can watch a movie in which I know the Spirit will not be... well... no thanks... I'm far too critical of movies as it is... For example... Hated the Last Mimzy... what a bunch of hippie nonsense... gah... and the parents in that movie were whiny cowards... stupid stupid movie... so many bad movies, so little time...
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
Well you know Ray you are a sensitive soul. And you are right we are all at a point where we need to have the spirit around us all the time. It's just that alot of people are not in tune enough to realize it as much as you are. Maybe I should go and post on the "opinion of others" thread. Because when you start letting other people's opinions sway you then you are putting yourself in a position to be lead down dangerous and difficult paths.
Bah! Stop being so nice to me, Poncho! I'm just trying like everyone else... and probably much more petty than most... I've seen rated R movies before, seen antimormon crap too, and I love reading history, and well... my hatred of bad movies is probably because I'm jealous that so many bad ideas get made into movies and my bad ideas are ignored. :)
I do think that decent folks like Jon Voight (who apparently is a decent chap) are being duped into defending an antimormon flick... with the veneer of academia...
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
Oh alright Ray I'll start being mean and nasty to you you high-minded, insensitive clod! Is that better? Yeah, I too would like to know why so many bad ideas make it to the big screen! I got plenty of bad ideas myself to pass along!
I actually like John Voight. He is one of the few moderate to conservative Hollywood types. I think he is just clueless though here. Someone should have pointed out that the subjects of his movie probably won't go see it, not because of the subject matter but because you made a movie that has a rating that most Mormons won't go see. I don't blame him though. He was an actor playing a role. He probably was given some less than accurate historical material in his research for playing the role and believes it is accurate.
Hollywood and History have never really gotten along. Nearly every Hollywood production of a historical event gets it wrong. If you want entertainment watch a movie but if you want to learn about history then get some books. Even documentaries get it wrong with a good example being that PBS docushamery about Mormons that recently aired.
I just like to see how people can get to a place where they think this is okay. Add to that the fact that these were endowed LDSs, it just adds to my fascination.
I agree that it would be interesting to know their mindset, so I can avoid said mindset. I am not sure that this particular movie will reveal that to us.
Also, if you have studied the history of the endowment at all, endowed members of the time may have interpreted their covenants in such a way that they would feel not only justified in committing this attrocity, but divinely directed to do so.
Let's just say, they had one or two extra covenants back then.
salesortonscom wrote:I had seen an interview with John Voight a few weeks back who plays the part of Brigham Young in the film.
The thought that Mormons don't want to face this part of their history is demonstrably a false statement on Voight's part. I am sure that ANY history book regarding the massacre, from whatever perspective, will sell best among Mormons.
And, FWIW, I think Voight portrays a fictional bishop, and not BY. The Brigham character gets precious little screen time.
Gosh, we're already talking like we know all about what this movie is going to be... it's not even out yet. I don't get that. Just because it wasn't made by Richard Rich or whoever, we turn our back on it. Is it meant to be antimormon? Ask yourselves honestly, if this was an incident from the Baptist church in the 1940s deep South, wouldn't we all be talking about what whackos these people were and it just goes to show how wrong their religion must be?
"...and telling it to take a break for a few hours so I can watch a movie in which I know the Spirit will not be... " This sounds to me like the Spirit is some airborne particle that floats in and lands on you. If you in the "wrong" physical location, you can't have the Spirit. Or if you are subject to falsehoods, you cannot have the Spirit.
And yes, hoss, the endowment of the 1850s was not the endowment of today. Add to that the testimony of some that certain Arkansas immigrants were bragging that they held the gun that killed Joseph Smith and they were intent on returning to "do in" Brigham, too...
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
Medved is calling it antimormon, and he's an observant jew. Somehow I think if HE can see the antimormonism in the portrayal of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, then it's kinda bad... But luckily you're going, so you can tell us if Medved's full of crapola.
--Ray
__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special. (Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)
I'm not suggesting its anti-mormon, but considering Hollywood's track record and the subject matter that the movie is portraying does anyone really think its going to put mormonism in good light? Anyway, we'll see. Let us know Coco!
Yes, my precious ones, do not go out among the wolves... I will do it for you and return to let you all know about it. You can trust my judgment, since I'm just a hair less whacked than ray.
P.S. I may not be going opening weekend, cuz I'm going to a horse training clinic... but do not despair or think I have shirked my duty. (Oooh... there's that word again.)
__________________
Life is tough but it's tougher if you're stupid. -John Wayne
At least you are right after hubby, Son1, Daughter, Son2, my Lupus support group and the mailman... Sure... It's true, I accept everything you say as fact and then liberally hit it with the salt shaker...