Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The Iraq thing...


Hot Air Balloon

Status: Offline
Posts: 5370
Date:
The Iraq thing...


http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070501-121857-3393r.htm
 
Will they fund the troops or not?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2007/04/iraq_report_anbar_awakening_sp.asp

Is the troop surge working or not?

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070501183732.qcbdhxdj&show_article=1

Prince Charles thinks there's a more important war to fight...

--Ray

__________________
I'm not slow; I'm special.
(Don't take it personally, everyone finds me offensive. Yet somehow I manage to live with myself.)


Wise and Revered Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 2882
Date:

A. Yes, troops will be funded because the dems will face a huge backlash if troops start getting killed because of no money.

B. Too early to tell.

C. Prince Charles is an inbred moron. He isn't even English. I say throw the Hanovarian imposters out and put a real English Peer back on the throne. Send the Hanovarians packing back to where they came from.

-- Edited by salesortonscom at 14:48, 2007-05-01

__________________

God Made Man, Sam Colt Made Him Equal.

Jason



Senior Bucketkeeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 1288
Date:

What Jase said,... I just hope that Mormon Dingy Harry grows up and realizes that he made a mistake.

__________________
no unhallowed hand can stop the work from progressing... the truth of God will go forth till it has penetrated every website, sounded in every ear, till the purposes of God shall be accomplished and the great Jehovah shall say the work is done


Profuse Pontificator

Status: Offline
Posts: 876
Date:

The Washington Times reports "Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, is courting Republican support for compromise war-funding legislation to follow Mr. Bush's promised veto this week of a $124 billion bill that would start a pullout as soon as July. Senior Democratic aides say that although House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is not similarly talking to Republicans about a post-veto agreement, she privately acknowledges that eventually the "money will get to the troops without timetables.""



World Affairs Brief reports "Democratic House and Senate conferees watered down the fixed withdrawal timetable which is part of the Iraq spending bill to avoid a promised veto. Actually, the bill is a total sellout. There are fine-print exceptions listed in the bill's withdrawal language which actually allow the Pentagon to increase troops if they will be used to fight al-qaeda, protect American troops, protect American civilians (contractors) or train Iraqi soldiers. That's a recipe for expansion under almost any pretext! The administration has a habit of resurrecting the threat of al-Qaeda whenever convenient."



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard